[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Best Practices (was: rapidsvn feedback)

From: Josef Wolf <jw_at_raven.inka.de>
Date: 2002-08-01 20:46:40 CEST

On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 10:41:47AM -0500, Karl Fogel wrote:

> > I still think it is not worth to create a separate document because
[ ... ]
> No, *not* in the svn repo. In its own repo. New document, new
> project. Not related to Subversion.

Ummm. Do we really want to run an own repo for just a couple of pages?

> Of course, most of this stuff is *already* in the svn repo, in the
> HACKING file.

The HACKING file describes the politics of the _svn_ project. This is
different from a file with suggestions to newbies how to run _their_

But maybe you are right and it would actually get a lot of pages, so
it would make sense to separate it. So give me some days to put the
pieces together and _then_ determine whether/where we want to put the

-- Josef Wolf -- jw@raven.inka.de --
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Aug 1 20:47:45 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.