[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Feature request: Keyword $Rev$ with a twist

From: <brane_at_xbc.nu>
Date: 2002-08-01 15:19:37 CEST

Quoting Julian Fitzell <julian@beta4.com>:

> Josef Wolf wrote:
> [...]
> > There is no technical reason for the current behavior of cvs/svn, it
> > is a _political_ decision.
> >
> > Maybe you could try again and give me a _real_ use case for
> mixed-revs?
> > Please do not mis-understand me: I _know_ there are real use cases
> for
> > mixed-revs. But I don't believe that those use-cases are so frequent
> > that it is worth to burden the day-by-day use.
> [...]
> I dunno, I sometimes have stable tagged versions of software checked out
> and then want to update just one file that I know has had some important
> bug fix made to it. Am I misunderstanding or doesn't that need
> mixed-revs?

This case absolutely requires mixed revs, yes.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Aug 1 15:20:28 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.