[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Feature request: Keyword $Rev$ with a twist

From: Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_newton.ch.collab.net>
Date: 2002-08-01 17:54:29 CEST

Josef Wolf <jw@raven.inka.de> writes:
> There is no technical reason for the current behavior of cvs/svn, it
> is a _political_ decision.
> Maybe you could try again and give me a _real_ use case for mixed-revs?
> Please do not mis-understand me: I _know_ there are real use cases for
> mixed-revs. But I don't believe that those use-cases are so frequent
> that it is worth to burden the day-by-day use.
> But anyway, we already discussed this topic about two months ago and
> agreed on leaving it as is for now and discuss it again after 1.0 is
> out.

So why are you bringing it up again now, during Alpha?

What I'm really saying is: this list is active enough already, Josef.
If you openly acknowledge that a post is not constructive (as you do
above), then don't post on that topic at all, to save everyone else's

Thank you,

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Aug 1 18:09:16 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.