[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Feature request: Keyword $Rev$ with a twist

From: Julian Fitzell <julian_at_beta4.com>
Date: 2002-08-01 10:36:47 CEST

Josef Wolf wrote:
[...]
> There is no technical reason for the current behavior of cvs/svn, it
> is a _political_ decision.
>
> Maybe you could try again and give me a _real_ use case for mixed-revs?
> Please do not mis-understand me: I _know_ there are real use cases for
> mixed-revs. But I don't believe that those use-cases are so frequent
> that it is worth to burden the day-by-day use.

[...]

I dunno, I sometimes have stable tagged versions of software checked out
and then want to update just one file that I know has had some important
bug fix made to it. Am I misunderstanding or doesn't that need mixed-revs?

Julian

-- 
julian@beta4.com
Beta4 Productions (http://www.beta4.com)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Aug 1 10:37:38 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.