Re: Feature request: Keyword $Rev$ with a twist
From: Josef Wolf <jw_at_raven.inka.de>
Date: 2002-08-01 10:24:47 CEST
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 12:13:42AM +0200, Branko ??ibej wrote:
> >Having used CVS for about 10 years now, I still have no clue why you
So your main argument is "We need mixed-revs because we always had
> When you "cvs commit", only your changes get sent to the server; your
I don't agree with this one. Not modifying your working files on commit
The use case you mentioned above arises only because you already
There is no technical reason for the current behavior of cvs/svn, it
Maybe you could try again and give me a _real_ use case for mixed-revs?
But anyway, we already discussed this topic about two months ago and
-- -- Josef Wolf -- jw@raven.inka.de -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.orgReceived on Thu Aug 1 10:25:44 2002 |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.