[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: EINVAL vs APR_EINVAL in apr_xlate_open()

From: Jim Jagielski <jim_at_jaguNET.com>
Date: 2002-07-19 01:06:40 CEST

Karl Fogel wrote:
> Maybe we should still go with APR_EINVAL, on the principle of least
> surprise, though. I'm not sure; trusting people with more APR
> experience to know a good answer here.

Not sure how that section of code is (and too lazy right now to take a
gander) but assuming that whatever checks the return value is aware
that it can rec' "traditional" errno values as well as APR_EINVAL,

   Jim Jagielski   [|]   jim_at_jaguNET.com   [|]   http://www.jaguNET.com/
      "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
             will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Jul 19 02:26:21 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.