Re: EINVAL vs APR_EINVAL in apr_xlate_open()

Karl Fogel wrote:
>
> Maybe we should still go with APR_EINVAL, on the principle of least
> surprise, though. I'm not sure; trusting people with more APR
> experience to know a good answer here.
>

Not sure how that section of code is (and too lazy right now to take a
gander) but assuming that whatever checks the return value is aware
that it can rec' "traditional" errno values as well as APR_EINVAL,
+1 on EINVAL -> APR_EINVAL

-- 
===========================================================================
   Jim Jagielski   [|]   jim_at_jaguNET.com   [|]   http://www.jaguNET.com/
      "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
             will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org