[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: EINVAL vs APR_EINVAL in apr_xlate_open()

From: Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_newton.ch.collab.net>
Date: 2002-07-19 00:04:33 CEST

Justin Erenkrantz <jerenkrantz@apache.org> writes:
> In APR calls, if EINVAL is produced, it should use APR_EINVAL.
> And, for checking for error, the caller should use
> APR_STATUS_IS_EINVAL(s). -- justin

Well, this is *us* generating the EINVAL by fiat, not getting it from
some lower-down system call.

Maybe we should still go with APR_EINVAL, on the principle of least
surprise, though. I'm not sure; trusting people with more APR
experience to know a good answer here.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Jul 19 00:16:45 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.