Re: CVS update: MODIFIED: libsvn_wc ...

On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 08:39:14PM -0000, kfogel@tigris.org wrote:
>...
> --- svn_repos.h 2001/04/27 06:53:01 1.6
> +++ svn_repos.h 2001/05/08 20:39:13 1.7
> @@ -89,7 +89,11 @@
> /* Given a REPORT_BATON constructed by svn_repos_begin_report(), this routine
> will build REVISION:PATH into the current transaction. This routine is
> called multiple times to create a transaction that is a "mirror" of a
> - working copy. */
> + working copy.
> +
> + The first call should pass an empty PATH, allowing the reporter to
> + do any setup that depends on just the revision number (such as
> + creating a txn). */
> svn_error_t *
> svn_repos_set_path (void *report_baton,
> svn_string_t *path,

"the revision number" ... isn't the empty PATH and revision number talking
about the revision of the root directory? We aren't just talking about some
random rev pulled out of nowhere. And it does apply to the root ("").

Does that seem right? (i.e. should I update that doc?)

Cheers,
-g

-- 
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org