Re: CVS update: MODIFIED: libsvn_wc ...

Greg Stein <gstein@lyra.org> writes:
> > + The first call should pass an empty PATH, allowing the reporter to
> > + do any setup that depends on just the revision number (such as
> > + creating a txn). */
> > svn_error_t *
> > svn_repos_set_path (void *report_baton,
> > svn_string_t *path,
>
> "the revision number" ... isn't the empty PATH and revision number talking
> about the revision of the root directory? We aren't just talking about some
> random rev pulled out of nowhere. And it does apply to the root ("").
>
> Does that seem right? (i.e. should I update that doc?)

Hmm, you know, I think that is a better way to express it. I'll fix
it.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:30 2006