Karl Fogel <kfogel@collab.net> writes:
> Greg Stein <gstein@lyra.org> writes:
> > > + The first call should pass an empty PATH, allowing the reporter to
> > > + do any setup that depends on just the revision number (such as
> > > + creating a txn). */
> > > svn_error_t *
> > > svn_repos_set_path (void *report_baton,
> > > svn_string_t *path,
> >
> > "the revision number" ... isn't the empty PATH and revision number talking
> > about the revision of the root directory? We aren't just talking about some
> > random rev pulled out of nowhere. And it does apply to the root ("").
> >
> > Does that seem right? (i.e. should I update that doc?)
>
> Hmm, you know, I think that is a better way to express it. I'll fix
> it.
Right. Make sure your doc says that the root that we pass in ("") to
the first call is the root of the *update*, not of a repository tree.
After all, all paths coming into set_path() are relative to the root
of the update.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:30 2006