[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Who else is using SVN for large-binary-asset storage?

From: Branko Čibej <brane_at_apache.org>
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2020 20:23:44 +0200

On 25.04.2020 20:18, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Mark Phippard wrote on Sat, 25 Apr 2020 18:01 +00:00:
>> But the final goal should be something like this (in order of importance):
>> 1. Do not store a pristine in working copy for the file
>> 2. Do not do deltification on the client when committing
>> 3. Do not do compression on server when storing
>> 4. Do not do deltification on server
> Does #4 apply to commits, updates, or both?

#3 and #4 are both moderately pink herrings. The problem with
compression and deltification on the server (for in-repository storage)
is that it's currently done synchronously at transaction-commit time.
There are good reasons to change that to asynchronous post-processing,
possibly as part of 'svnadmin pack'.

-- Brane
Received on 2020-04-25 20:23:48 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.