Re: Apparent "svn rm" scaling problem in 1.7.x

On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 1:10 PM, <michael_rytting_at_agilent.com> wrote:

> LOL! I love the env variable.
>
> Here is some similar data for a local working copy. These are all run
> with the env variable set. Again, svn rm is significantly slower than all
> other operations.
>
> svn rm <file> 0.35s
> svn st <file> 0.105s
> svn blame 0.041s
> svn unlock 0.056s
> svn lock 0.053s
> svn log 0.036s
> svn info 0.014s
>

But look how much it improved compared to how much the others improved?

svn rm <file> 7s
svn add <file> 0.126s
svn st <file> 2s
svn blame <file> 0.2s
svn lock <file> 0.12s
svn unlock <file> 0.103s
svn log <file> 0.089s
svn revert <file> 0.133s
svn info <file> 0.074s

Many of these commands are not even impacted by that variable. That said,
I do not get how this envvar can shave 7 seconds off the operation when it
usually only sleeps for a second.

-- 
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/