[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Apparent "svn rm" scaling problem in 1.7.x

From: Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 13:17:38 -0400

On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 1:10 PM, <michael_rytting_at_agilent.com> wrote:

> LOL! I love the env variable.
> Here is some similar data for a local working copy. These are all run
> with the env variable set. Again, svn rm is significantly slower than all
> other operations.
> svn rm <file> 0.35s
> svn st <file> 0.105s
> svn blame 0.041s
> svn unlock 0.056s
> svn lock 0.053s
> svn log 0.036s
> svn info 0.014s

But look how much it improved compared to how much the others improved?

svn rm <file> 7s
svn add <file> 0.126s
svn st <file> 2s
svn blame <file> 0.2s
svn lock <file> 0.12s
svn unlock <file> 0.103s
svn log <file> 0.089s
svn revert <file> 0.133s
svn info <file> 0.074s

Many of these commands are not even impacted by that variable. That said,
I do not get how this envvar can shave 7 seconds off the operation when it
usually only sleeps for a second.

Mark Phippard
Received on 2011-11-01 18:18:11 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.