RE: Apparent "svn rm" scaling problem in 1.7.x
From: <michael_rytting_at_agilent.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 11:15:52 -0600
Oh and to measure the time, I'm using a stopwatch and synchronizing the start of the command with pressing go on my stop watch. I then push stop when the command completes.
P.S. Actually I'm using the linux time command :) i.e. "time svn st <file>"
-----Original Message-----
On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 10:38:07AM -0600, michael_rytting_at_agilent.com wrote:
Before the patch, we had:
"svn rm dir/*" 6m15s 1.7.1
So this patch cut about 4 minutes of runtime, which is somwhat significant but definitely not enough. But it's a step in the right direction.
> As a side note, I really think there is fundamentally something wrong of the performance of "svn rm" with large working copies. Here are some example times.
Yes, that looks bad. There might be a linear DB table scan involved in 'svn rm' that becomes noticable on large WCs.
How are you measuring the time?
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.