On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 3:52 AM, Alan Barrett <apb_at_cequrux.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Oct 2010, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> > What he really wants is an alternate-universe Subversion which never
>> > had the plaintext password storage feature in the first place.
>>
>> I'd settle for being able to block that local use on the server side:
>
> OK, so you want a feature in which the client reports to the server
> "here are some important aspects of my configuration", and the server
> replies "I don't like <this> aspect of your configuration, so I refuse
> to work with you". I suggest that you write up a proposal for such a
> feature, or begin a focused discussion about how such a feature could
> work and could be useful.
>
> --apb (Alan Barrett)
I think the gpg-agent support will provide that by forcing people to a
new authentication protocol. Won't that work?
Received on 2010-10-17 14:42:30 CEST