Re: svn Farm

On Sun, 17 Oct 2010, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > What he really wants is an alternate-universe Subversion which never
> > had the plaintext password storage feature in the first place.
>
> I'd settle for being able to block that local use on the server side:

OK, so you want a feature in which the client reports to the server
"here are some important aspects of my configuration", and the server
replies "I don't like <this> aspect of your configuration, so I refuse
to work with you". I suggest that you write up a proposal for such a
feature, or begin a focused discussion about how such a feature could
work and could be useful.

--apb (Alan Barrett)
Received on 2010-10-17 09:53:51 CEST