Re: Tigris binary packages for Windows
Troy Simpson wrote:
> For base-level support, we narrowed that down to apache 2.2x. Do we really
> need to support all the python builds? They were a great service from D.J.
> Heap, but now that we don't have that, do we really need to ditch all
> windows builds? What we could look at is a standard base-level windows
> build that most people use. Personally, I just use a windows client, as do
> many users - I don't even use the apache bindings, nor do many windows
> users. We could leave specialised builds to teams who want to support them
> which in theory would make the job at this end much easier.
Well, I, for one, would need the Apache 2.2 bindings but I do not need
the Python bindings at all, which I suspect most users don't either.
So basic binaries with 2.2 support would be perfect for starters
Received on 2010-03-03 11:27:36 CET
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users