[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Tigris binary packages for Windows

From: Bojan Resnik <resnikb_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 11:31:55 +0100

2010/3/3 Olivier Sannier <obones_at_free.fr>

> Troy Simpson wrote:
>
>> For base-level support, we narrowed that down to apache 2.2x. Do we
>> really
>> need to support all the python builds? They were a great service from D.J.
>> Heap, but now that we don't have that, do we really need to ditch all
>> windows builds? What we could look at is a standard base-level windows
>> build that most people use. Personally, I just use a windows client, as
>> do
>> many users - I don't even use the apache bindings, nor do many windows
>> users. We could leave specialised builds to teams who want to support
>> them
>> which in theory would make the job at this end much easier.
>>
>>
> Well, I, for one, would need the Apache 2.2 bindings but I do not need the
> Python bindings at all, which I suspect most users don't either.
> So basic binaries with 2.2 support would be perfect for starters
>

Agreed, Apache 2.2 bindings are must for me as well. Python and Ruby
bindings would be nice, but our process doesn't depend on those.

--
Bojan Resnik
Received on 2010-03-03 11:32:50 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.