[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Tigris binary packages for Windows

From: Bojan Resnik <resnikb_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 11:31:55 +0100

2010/3/3 Olivier Sannier <obones_at_free.fr>

> Troy Simpson wrote:
>> For base-level support, we narrowed that down to apache 2.2x. Do we
>> really
>> need to support all the python builds? They were a great service from D.J.
>> Heap, but now that we don't have that, do we really need to ditch all
>> windows builds? What we could look at is a standard base-level windows
>> build that most people use. Personally, I just use a windows client, as
>> do
>> many users - I don't even use the apache bindings, nor do many windows
>> users. We could leave specialised builds to teams who want to support
>> them
>> which in theory would make the job at this end much easier.
> Well, I, for one, would need the Apache 2.2 bindings but I do not need the
> Python bindings at all, which I suspect most users don't either.
> So basic binaries with 2.2 support would be perfect for starters

Agreed, Apache 2.2 bindings are must for me as well. Python and Ruby
bindings would be nice, but our process doesn't depend on those.

Bojan Resnik
Received on 2010-03-03 11:32:50 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.