[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: Speed issues with ra_neon to remote repositories

From: Bob Archer <bob.archer_at_amsi.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 11:02:08 -0400

> Bob Archer wrote:
> >> OK, so on the surface ra_svn is clearly the solution...except you
> >> can't do transparent proxying of reads/writes to a local slave with
> >> ra_svn...so you're going have to get to the situation of doing
> >> general read operations from the local slave, either with ra_svn or
> >> ra_neon and then when you do a (large) commit have to switch to
> using
> >> ra_svn. This will either require a deal of effort for the individual
> >> engineer, or a script to perform this for them.
> >
> > My first question would be, do you "really" need the slave/mirrors?
> We have development that is shared across sites. So, yes.
> John.

We do too... three sites. Yet, we only have a single repo server at one site that all users access.



To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-06-24 17:03:10 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.