[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Speed issues with ra_neon to remote repositories

From: John Beranek <john_at_redux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:05:39 +0100

Bob Archer wrote:
>> Bob Archer wrote:
>>>> OK, so on the surface ra_svn is clearly the solution...except
>>>> you can't do transparent proxying of reads/writes to a local
>>>> slave with ra_svn...so you're going have to get to the
>>>> situation of doing general read operations from the local
>>>> slave, either with ra_svn or ra_neon and then when you do a
>>>> (large) commit have to switch to
>> using
>>>> ra_svn. This will either require a deal of effort for the
>>>> individual engineer, or a script to perform this for them.
>>> My first question would be, do you "really" need the
>>> slave/mirrors?
>> We have development that is shared across sites. So, yes.
>> John.
> We do too... three sites. Yet, we only have a single repo server at
> one site that all users access.

That wouldn't help though - commits from India direct to the UK master
are still _very_ slow.


John Beranek                         To generalise is to be an idiot.
http://redux.org.uk/                                 -- William Blake
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].

Received on 2009-06-24 17:06:48 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.