[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Speed issues with ra_neon to remote repositories

From: John Beranek <john_at_redux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:57:31 +0100

Bob Archer wrote:
>> OK, so on the surface ra_svn is clearly the solution...except you can't
>> do transparent proxying of reads/writes to a local slave with
>> ra_svn...so you're going have to get to the situation of doing general
>> read operations from the local slave, either with ra_svn or ra_neon and
>> then when you do a (large) commit have to switch to using ra_svn. This
>> will either require a deal of effort for the individual engineer, or a
>> script to perform this for them.
> My first question would be, do you "really" need the slave/mirrors?

We have development that is shared across sites. So, yes.


John Beranek                         To generalise is to be an idiot.
http://redux.org.uk/                                 -- William Blake
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].

Received on 2009-06-24 17:00:42 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.