[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: x86 is stone age, how about moving along ?

From: Mircea Zahan <mzahan_at_adaptive.ro>
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 22:26:17 +0200

As I said before, I do not master C/C++ in order to be
up to such a task. I imagine that the source code is quite
large and I do remember from some years ago that compiling
C code is not even close as easy as Delphi code.

But once one has managed to compile it for x86, it should
be fairly easy to do it for x64 as well, with minimum effort.
My mail was actually targeted to those developers which
already did the compiling for x86.

--Mircea

----- Original Message -----
From: "Toby Thain" <toby_at_telegraphics.com.au>
To: "Mircea Zahan" <mzahan_at_adaptive.ro>
Cc: "Andy Levy" <andy.levy_at_gmail.com>; <users_at_subversion.tigris.org>
Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2008 7:04 PM
Subject: Re: x86 is stone age, how about moving along ?

>
> On 30-Nov-08, at 10:23 AM, Mircea Zahan wrote:
>
>> Well now, for someone proficient with a programming language,
>> recompiling sources for just another flavor of Windows should be
>> a task of what ... a few minutes ? I am not proficient with C(++?)
>> but I do posess knowledge in Delphi. So it happens to know a
>> little about the big picture.
>>
>> I don't think it's a matter of time or cost, it's just a matter of
>> wanting
>> to do it.
>>
>
>
> You just provided the compelling argument for doing it yourself.
>
> --Toby
>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andy Levy" <andy.levy_at_gmail.com>
>> To: "Mircea Zahan" <mzahan_at_adaptive.ro>
>> Cc: <users_at_subversion.tigris.org>
>> Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2008 1:43 PM
>> Subject: Re: x86 is stone age, how about moving along ?
>>
>>
>>> On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 05:32, Mircea Zahan <mzahan_at_adaptive.ro>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Hello everybody,
>>>>
>>>> Is there any chance for you to publish x64 version of
>>>> Subversion's binaries
>>>> for Windows?
>>>> Please don't reply with something like "get the sources and
>>>> compile it", not
>>>> everyone is proficient
>>>> with C programming/compiling.
>>>>
>>>> I know the existing binaries do work on x64, but I want to have a
>>>> pure x64
>>>> environment.
>>>> At this very moment the SVN server is the only x86 application
>>>> running on
>>>> our server.
>>>>
>>>> Every major server of any kind already has x64 binaries, yours
>>>> doesn't. It's
>>>> dissapointing for
>>>> such a marvelous piece of software.
>>> Binary packages, especially the ones for Windows and all the ones not
>>> offered by companies, are done by *volunteers*. Their schedules may
>>> not allow for it, or they may not have access to the required systems
>>> to do it.
>>> If you're looking for a company to do it, they need to see a
>>> financial
>>> incentive for it. CollabNet sells support for Subversion and they
>>> haven't (apparently) seen enough reason to justify the cost yet.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
>>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-11-30 21:26:45 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.