RE: Regarding "Some revisions have been merged under it that have not been merged"

That is certainly my understanding, because a move adds mergeinfo property.

This behaviour should be removed now from the latest SVN releases though (from 1.5.4?) so this should work better now ....

Geir

________________________________
From: Joe Bell [mailto:joe.bell_at_prodeasystems.com]
Sent: 15. november 2008 19:02
To: users_at_subversion.tigris.org
Subject: Regarding "Some revisions have been merged under it that have not been merged"

Hi,

I'm just looking for a clarification on the post:

http://blogs.open.collab.net/svn/2008/07/subversion-merg.html

and a plain English interpretation. From reading this post and all of the threads on this list, it boils down to:

Don't move things around in your branch and expect --reintegrate to work.

Is that accurate?

Joseph Bell

This message is confidential to Prodea Systems, Inc unless otherwise indicated
or apparent from its nature. This message is directed to the intended recipient
only, who may be readily determined by the sender of this message and its
contents. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an
employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended
recipient:(a)any dissemination or copying of this message is strictly
prohibited; and(b)immediately notify the sender by return message and destroy
any copies of this message in any form(electronic, paper or otherwise) that you
have.The delivery of this message and its information is neither intended to be
nor constitutes a disclosure or waiver of any trade secrets, intellectual
property, attorney work product, or attorney-client communications. The
authority of the individual sending this message to legally bind Prodea Systems
is neither apparent nor implied,and must be independently verified.
Received on 2008-11-18 17:59:33 CET