On Sep 26, 2007, at 07:22, Erik Huelsmann wrote:
> On 9/26/07, Andy Levy <andy.levy@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 9/26/07, Matthew Hannigan <mlh@zip.com.au> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 05:39:37PM +1000, Dmitri Colebatch wrote:
>>>> On 9/26/07, Matjaz <mc1607slo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 9/26/07, Dmitri Colebatch <dim@colebatch.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I must be missing something. In CVS I can do a "cvs -q up -n"
>>>>>> which
>>>>>> will tell me what CVS would do it I did an update. Subversion
>>>>>> doesn't
>>>>>> seem to have this feature. Can someone tell me if this is
>>>>>> something
>>>>>> I've missed?
>>>>>
>>>>> http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.4/svn.forcvs.status-vs-
>>>>> update.html
>>>>
>>>> Bugger... whilst I knew that it had to be something I'd missed,
>>>> I wish
>>>> I hadn't been quite so stupid about it.... thanks for the
>>>> reference.
>>>
>>> Don't be hard on yourself. I think something like svn status --
>>> dryrun
>>> would be an eminently intuitive command, and I've never used CVS
>>
>> I think you mean svn up --dryrun. There's no need for a "dry run" of
>> svn st because it doesn't make any changes.
>
> There's already an open issue for 'svn up --dryrun'; don't remember
> the number off-hand now.
It's:
http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2491
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Sep 27 00:48:22 2007