There has been no other issues than performance, but reading some of the
other posts in this thread I realize that this may just be down to luck.
I will definitely switch to using svn://.
Thanks for your input.
/Viktor Linder
Brian Erickson wrote:
> I was told, back in January, that the file:// protocol was not suited
> for a multi-user enviroment. Have you had any issues other than
> performance?
>
> Brian
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Erik Huelsmann [mailto:ehuels@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 11:14 AM
>> To: Viktor Linder
>> Cc: users@subversion.tigris.org
>> Subject: Re: Performance of file:// vs svn://
>>
>> On 4/3/07, Viktor Linder <viktor@grin.se> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi!
>>> My company is currently using svn using the file:// protocol on a
>>> Windows network share. The reason this was chosen was
>>>
>> because of the
>>
>>> simple authentication setup.
>>> We are experiencing some performance issues, which has caused me to
>>> investigate if perhaps we should switch to using svnserve or Apache.
>>>
>>> Has anyone seen any performance gains using svn:// over file://?
>>>
>> Did you? Did you try it at all? It's easy to test yourself:
>> the svnserve program is the easiest server to set up...
>>
>>
>>> Our usage scenario is changes to many large binary files
>>>
>> for 50+ users.
>>
>>> Thankful for any answer!
>>>
>> Your own use is the best test-case you'll ever find to answer
>> these questions.
>>
>> bye, Erik.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
>>
>>
>>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Apr 5 08:18:10 2007