I was told, back in January, that the file:// protocol was not suited
for a multi-user enviroment. Have you had any issues other than
performance?
Brian
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Erik Huelsmann [mailto:ehuels@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 11:14 AM
> To: Viktor Linder
> Cc: users@subversion.tigris.org
> Subject: Re: Performance of file:// vs svn://
>
> On 4/3/07, Viktor Linder <viktor@grin.se> wrote:
> > Hi!
> > My company is currently using svn using the file:// protocol on a
> > Windows network share. The reason this was chosen was
> because of the
> > simple authentication setup.
> > We are experiencing some performance issues, which has caused me to
> > investigate if perhaps we should switch to using svnserve or Apache.
> >
> > Has anyone seen any performance gains using svn:// over file://?
>
> Did you? Did you try it at all? It's easy to test yourself:
> the svnserve program is the easiest server to set up...
>
> > Our usage scenario is changes to many large binary files
> for 50+ users.
> >
> > Thankful for any answer!
>
> Your own use is the best test-case you'll ever find to answer
> these questions.
>
> bye, Erik.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Apr 3 18:02:00 2007