[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Eclipse client - Subversive vs. Subclipse

From: Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2006-12-28 20:38:37 CET

On 12/28/06, Johnathan Gifford <jgifford@wernervas.com> wrote:

> Another advantage of Subclipse over Subversive is the current effort to
> get Subclipse as part of the Eclipse project. While this effort is
> stalled (not by Subclipse) due to a licensing issue with one of
> Subversion's dependcies, this maybe resolved this year sometime. Keep
> in mind Subversive is own by Polarion where Subclipse is totally
> open-source.

I am the project lead for Subclipse, so I obviously feel you should
use Subclipse. That being said, I do feel the need to correct this.
Subversive has also submitted a proposal to Eclipse, and their
proposal is actually further along in the process. Also, their
product is licensed the same as Subclipse (EPL). That being said, it
is correct that it is essentially the efforts of one company, where as
Subclipse is a true community project and is more closely aligned with
Subversion and the Subversion committers (of which I am one).

I think you will also get better quality support as well as more
responsive, from Subclipse.

Mark Phippard
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Dec 28 20:38:52 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.