Re: Eclipse client - Subversive vs. Subclipse

On 12/28/06, Johnathan Gifford <jgifford@wernervas.com> wrote:

> Another advantage of Subclipse over Subversive is the current effort to
> get Subclipse as part of the Eclipse project. While this effort is
> stalled (not by Subclipse) due to a licensing issue with one of
> Subversion's dependcies, this maybe resolved this year sometime. Keep
> in mind Subversive is own by Polarion where Subclipse is totally
> open-source.

I am the project lead for Subclipse, so I obviously feel you should
use Subclipse. That being said, I do feel the need to correct this.
Subversive has also submitted a proposal to Eclipse, and their
proposal is actually further along in the process. Also, their
product is licensed the same as Subclipse (EPL). That being said, it
is correct that it is essentially the efforts of one company, where as
Subclipse is a true community project and is more closely aligned with
Subversion and the Subversion committers (of which I am one).

I think you will also get better quality support as well as more
responsive, from Subclipse.

-- 
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org