Both are very good plug-ins. Our teams prefer Subclipse because it is
more like the CVS plugin for Eclipse and since many of our developers
who use Eclipse have used the CVS plugin.
Another advantage of Subclipse over Subversive is the current effort to
get Subclipse as part of the Eclipse project. While this effort is
stalled (not by Subclipse) due to a licensing issue with one of
Subversion's dependcies, this maybe resolved this year sometime. Keep
in mind Subversive is own by Polarion where Subclipse is totally
open-source.
Either way, you'll be happy with either. But look to the long term as
well. When Subclipse does become part of the Eclipse project, you may
find more developers coming in with experience with Subclipse rather
than Subversive.
Johnathan
>>> On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 1:07 PM, in message
<359260C9CA8CC140A6F7E09A1F39D9E90148649F@sssmail.toronto.sigmasoft.ca>,
"Steven Whatmore" <Stevenw@sigmasoft.ca> wrote:
> Good afternoon,
>
> I am currently evaluating which Eclipse client to use for my
connection
> to SVN.
>
> Does anyone have any experience with these two clients and a PROS /
CONS
> of the two.
>
> 1) Subclipse
> 2) Subversive
>
> Any information would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Whatty
>
> Steve Whatmore
> Technical Lead Web Development
> Sigma Software Solutions
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Dec 28 20:19:25 2006