John Szakmeister wrote:
> ----- Ted Dennison <dennison@ssd.fsi.com> wrote:
> [snip]
>> Sadly, that does not change the fact that we agreed to a nasty NDA
>> with them before they did this. Someone who has never agreed to the
>> old NDA could perhaps share their own Subversion SCC, but I cannot.
>
> You might want to double-check your NDA. Most of the ones I've dealt
> with have explicit clauses stating that it's null and void if the
> information legitimately becomes public knowledge (i.e., the company
> opens the specification or discloses it to the public). I believe
> even Microsoft's standard NDA has that clause, but I haven't looked
> at mine recently.
Do you really want to fight that one out in court with Microsoft's lawyers?
As burdened as they are with losing in the EU, a relatively easy target
might look good on their quarterly reports and help justify their funding.
>> Next time I sell my soul, I hope I at least get a lollipop. :-(
>
> Well said. :-)
>
> -John
Or at least a kiss and a goodbye.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Jul 19 01:27:57 2006