[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Feedback/experiences on PushOK SVN

From: John Szakmeister <john_at_szakmeister.net>
Date: 2006-07-18 22:18:16 CEST

----- Ted Dennison <dennison@ssd.fsi.com> wrote:
[snip]
> Sadly, that does not change the fact that we agreed to a nasty NDA with
> them before they did this. Someone who has never agreed to the old NDA
> could perhaps share their own Subversion SCC, but I cannot.

You might want to double-check your NDA. Most of the ones I've dealt with have explicit clauses stating that it's null and void if the information legitimately becomes public knowledge (i.e., the company opens the specification or discloses it to the public). I believe even Microsoft's standard NDA has that clause, but I haven't looked at mine recently.

>
> Next time I sell my soul, I hope I at least get a lollipop. :-(

Well said. :-)

-John

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Jul 18 22:19:57 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.