[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Internal Error: Failed to Load Module for FS type

From: C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: 2006-02-16 14:45:05 CET

[Taking a deep breath...]

Mark, sorry your experience with Subversion has been ...
less-than-pleasant. Unfortunately, you've mailed the Subversion source
code commits list. Your mail is better aimed at
users@subversion.tigris.org (which I'm Cc:ing in this response).

That said, some inline responses follow.

Mark Galbreath wrote:
> 'bdb''
> or
> 'fsfs'
> Could not fetch resource information. [500, #0]
> Could not open the requested SVN filesystem [500, #160033]
> Yes, I've read every friggin post in the mail archive, everything on the
> svn website, and even RTFM (book).
> That being said, I am using Apache 2.2.0 with svn 1.3.0. All the
> DAV/SVN/AUTHZ modules are loaded, and my httpd.conf entry looks like this:
> <Location /svn>
> DAV svn
> SVNParentPath /opt/svn # one repos under parent right now called
> 'newwww'
> # plus all the usual security crap that is commented out right now
> </Location>
> Yes, the owner/group of the repos is identical to Apache httpd.
> So wtf is this fail-to-load error (which screws everything) showing up
> in the apache error_log every time I try to use the svn client or a web
> browser to connect to the repos? I've been trying to solve this for 2
> days!!!

I presume you are trying to access the repository using the URL
"http[s]://SERVER/svn/newwww/", yes? Are you able to, as the user that
Apache runs as, access the repository via "file:///opt/svn/newwww/" ?
Does 'svnlook youngest /opt/svn/newwww' yield anything interesting?

> And for that matter, wtf am I reading documentation that still refers to
> 1.1 and 1.2??? If you committers are going to release the software,
> don't you think updating the DOCUMENTATION would be a Good Thing, too?

Are there particular aspects of your problems with Subversion that you
feel are specific to versions of Subversion newer than 1.2? Obviously,
keeping the documentation up-to-date is desirable, but as with the code,
is mostly a volunteer effort. If you have patches which will improve
the coverage or quality of that documentation, please submit them (to
svnbook-dev@red-bean.com). Thanks.

C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato@collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Distributed Development On Demand

Received on Thu Feb 16 14:49:57 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.