Re: repository on client is newer than on server as a result of server hd failure

From: Josh Kuo <josh.kuo_at_prioritynetworks.net>
Date: 2006-02-09 00:24:57 CET

I do have RAID level 1 set up. I guess I am just paranoid :-)

> If the data is so crucial, then why not use RAID to mirror the drive?
> Seems like a much better system from a performance perspective.
>
> jon
>

-- 
Josh Kuo <josh.kuo@prioritynetworks.net>

application/pgp-signature attachment: This is a digitally signed message part

Received on Thu Feb 9 00:27:09 2006

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Jennifer Kesterson: "Different ways to create tags -- is this OK?"
Previous message: Jon Scott Stevens: "Re: repository on client is newer than on server as a result of server hd failure"
In reply to: Jon Scott Stevens: "Re: repository on client is newer than on server as a result of server hd failure"
Next in thread: Ryan Schmidt: "Re: repository on client is newer than on server as a result of server hd failure"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]