Re: repository on client is newer than on server as a result of server hd failure

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Feb 8, 2006, at 2:48 PM, Josh Kuo wrote:

> Of course, this puts a dent on the overall performance, especially
> when
> you have many commits back to back for the same repository, but it
> works
> well for me. I have a repository that does not get as many commits
> (maybe a dozen a day), but it is crucial that I do not lose any
> revisions. So I am willing to sacrifice a little performance for
> that.

If the data is so crucial, then why not use RAID to mirror the drive?
Seems like a much better system from a performance perspective.

jon

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFD6n0N24RYsUKZY+oRAgiuAKDEHgEjex+WHKtL/cyhC5AOdoUq5wCg78jG
HXm9kg1K2BBOOREjU3vFYn0=
=L9Bh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Feb 9 00:24:21 2006