Re: Python bindings problem (1.3.0)
From: David James <djames_at_collab.net>
Date: 2006-01-29 08:00:41 CET
On 1/15/06, Paulo da Silva <psdasilva@esoterica.pt> wrote:
This is a bug in the Python bindings. For now, I would recommend to
> 2.
Unfortunately the documentation for the SWIG bindings is limited at
C header:
To use this function, you can type:
If you like to manage your memory manually, you can also pass in a memory pool:
It's generally easier to let the Python bindings manage your memory
Cheers,
David
-- David James -- http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~james --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.orgReceived on Sun Jan 29 08:01:41 2006 |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.