RE: Netapps NAS(NFS) and FSFS?
From: Brent Webster <brent.webster_at_liquidcomputing.com>
Date: 2005-10-24 09:39:27 CEST
Thanks. I did get some personal responses to this subject also
--- Brent >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Ryan Schmidt [mailto:subversion-2005@ryandesign.com] >>Sent: October 23, 2005 8:21 PM >>To: Brent Webster >>Cc: users@subversion.tigris.org >>Subject: Re: Netapps NAS(NFS) and FSFS? >> >>On Oct 20, 2005, at 15:19, Brent Webster wrote: >> >>> We are using a NetApps Network Area Storage device for our Linux(NFS >>> mounted) and Windos home directories. I want to move my FSFS based >>> subversion repository to the NetApps for its high availability RAID >>> and backup technology. That particular directory will only be >>> exported back to one server machine so my users will still have to >>> "svn+ssh" to access the repository. Some questions: >>> >>> 1/ Based on reading the FAQ, RedBook,etc., it's only the >>Berkley based >>> subversion repository that can't be NFS mounted. FSFS based >>repository >>> can? >>> Any issues or concerns to watch out for? >>> >>> 2/ If question#1 is true, can I let the NetApps software preform an >>> arbitrary backup of the subversion repository without using >>hotcopy, >>> etc.? >> >>Since nobody else answered, I think the answers are "yes" and "yes." >>FSFS repositories can be hosted on NFS, and there should be >>no problem allowing the NAS to do backups at any time. (I'm >>answering not based on personal experience but based on what >>I've learned since I've been on the list.) >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.orgReceived on Mon Oct 24 09:42:05 2005 |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.