Actually, I plan to evaluate both BDB and FSFS.. thanks for the advice,
though.
Oliver Pajonk wrote:
> 2005/8/27, Blair Zajac <blair@orcaware.com>:
>
> > svnadmin create --fs-type bdb --bdb-txn-nosync repos
> >=20
>
>
> Just a thought: it seems to be that FSFS repositories are more stable and i=
> n=20
> most parts faster than BDB repositories (if backed by a decent filesystem).=
> =20
> Most people that reported problems with broken repositories had BDB ones an=
> d=20
> their problems were fixed almost everytime when they changed to FSFS.
>
> Is there a special reason why you use BDB?
>
> --=20
> Oliver Pajonk
>
=============================================================================
michaelMuller = mmuller_at_enduden.com | http://www.mindhog.net/~mmuller
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to
gain control. - Thomas Jefferson
=============================================================================
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Aug 28 00:45:55 2005