[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: `svn commit` -> only partial changeset

From: Christopher Ness <chris_at_nesser.org>
Date: 2005-05-02 14:49:29 CEST

On Sun, 2005-01-05 at 22:04 -0500, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> On May 1, 2005, at 9:05 PM, Christopher Ness wrote:
> >
> > Ahhh... no not a partial file, but some files were left out of the
> > revision that were identified as "to be added". I was under the
> > impression that everything was added successfully or nothing was added
> > at all.
>
> That's definitely the case. If the server moved the revision-file from
> 'txn' area to the 'revs' area, then it thinks the commit was completed.
> It means that the client sent everything it thought it should send,
> and the server thought the commit was finished as well.
>
> Was this an 'svn import'? Or an 'svn add [lots of things]; svn
> commit'?

svn add ./linux-2.4.27/ ; svn commit

Later on I did it like this though.

svn add --no-auto-props ./linux-2.4.27/ ; svn commit

> Occam's razor tells me that the most likely explanation is that you
> simply didn't schedule everything for addition that you thought you
> did.

Possible, but I don't think there are any files in the kernel tarball
that would be ignored or excluded by the client.

Just wanted to toss it out there in case anyone else has the same
problems with a large commit. The second add w/o the properties was
successful.

Cheers,
Chris

-- 
Software Engineering IV,
McMaster University
PGP Public Key: http://www.nesser.org/pgp-key/
08:42:28 up 7 days, 12:06, 2 users, load average: 0.35, 0.15, 0.06 
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html

Received on Mon May 2 14:51:58 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.