[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: `svn commit` -> only partial changeset

From: Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman_at_collab.net>
Date: 2005-05-02 05:04:41 CEST

On May 1, 2005, at 9:05 PM, Christopher Ness wrote:
>
> Ahhh... no not a partial file, but some files were left out of the
> revision that were identified as "to be added". I was under the
> impression that everything was added successfully or nothing was added
> at all.

That's definitely the case. If the server moved the revision-file from
'txn' area to the 'revs' area, then it thinks the commit was completed.
  It means that the client sent everything it thought it should send,
and the server thought the commit was finished as well.

Was this an 'svn import'? Or an 'svn add [lots of things]; svn
commit'?

Occam's razor tells me that the most likely explanation is that you
simply didn't schedule everything for addition that you thought you
did.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon May 2 05:08:00 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.