On Apr 4, 2005, at 6:23 PM, Kenneth Porter wrote:
> I was trying to figure out when my last merge from a vendor drop was
> done by looking at "svn log" but it failed to report my last commit of
> a merge. (The previous commit of a merge was reported, leaving me
> chasing a non-existent merge error for awhile because I merged from
> the wrong base revision.) After some digging around I came across this
> item in the issue tracker:
>
> <http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1580>
>
> Based on that I did a "svn update" and all of a sudden I could see
> several recent commits that weren't reported before. What's going on
> here? Why doesn't "svn commit" result in the WC completely
> synchronized with the repo?
>
> I looked back through my screen log and an earlier "svn info" shows
> the WC at rev r75 and following "svn update" it printed only "At
> revision 82.". "svn info" now shows 82.
>
> Is "svn log" not recursive when used against a WC? If not, what's the
> proper way to determine all log messages relevant to a complete WC
> tree?
>
> I'm using 1.1.1 as client on WinXP and subversion-1.1.2-2.3 by way of
> Apache on Fedora Core 2.
>
See FAQ: http://subversion.tigris.org/faq.html#hidden-log
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Apr 5 02:29:33 2005