On Monday 04 April 2005 19:23, Kenneth Porter wrote:
> I was trying to figure out when my last merge from a vendor drop was
> done by looking at "svn log" but it failed to report my last commit of
> a merge. (The previous commit of a merge was reported, leaving me
> chasing a non-existent merge error for awhile because I merged from the
> wrong base revision.) After some digging around I came across this item
> in the issue tracker:
>
> <http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1580>
>
> Based on that I did a "svn update" and all of a sudden I could see
> several recent commits that weren't reported before. What's going on
> here? Why doesn't "svn commit" result in the WC completely synchronized
> with the repo?
>
> I looked back through my screen log and an earlier "svn info" shows the
> WC at rev r75 and following "svn update" it printed only "At revision
> 82.". "svn info" now shows 82.
>
> Is "svn log" not recursive when used against a WC? If not, what's the
> proper way to determine all log messages relevant to a complete WC
> tree?
>
> I'm using 1.1.1 as client on WinXP and subversion-1.1.2-2.3 by way of
> Apache on Fedora Core 2.
Welcome to the world of mixed revision working copies. Check out this
FAQ:
http://subversion.tigris.org/faq.html#hidden-log
as well as the relevant section of the book:
http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.1/svn-book.html#svn-ch-2-sect-3.4
-John
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Apr 5 02:11:58 2005