Re: Known 'svn ls' bug?

On Nov 22, 2004, at 5:13 PM, v4r4n wrote:

> I just copied a file and removed the original (a rename by hand).
>
> I typed 'svn status' to confirm what I'd just done:
>
> D foo_old_name.c
> A + foo_new_name.c
>
> Then I randomly typed 'svn ls' and noticed that my newly copied file
> was not listed, but the old one was still there.
>

Hm, something like this?

[sussman@BenBook:~/scratch/wc]$ svn mv search.txt new.txt
A new.txt
D search.txt
[sussman@BenBook:~/scratch/wc]$ svn st
D search.txt
A + new.txt
[sussman@BenBook:~/scratch/wc]$ svn ls
DUTCH
foo/
medievia_commands
parental_history
proofbypoem
search.txt
slouch.z5
slouch1
westcoast.jpg

I think what's going on here is that 'svn ls' was originally meant to
be a repository browser -- it only operated on URLs. Then, later on,
we decided that 'svn ls' on a working-copy path would simply grab the
underlying URL, and use that. (Which is consistent with other
commands.)

So 'svn ls' is *always* doing a remote listing.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Nov 23 02:20:40 2004