[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Known 'svn ls' bug?

From: v4r4n <console.cowboy_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2004-11-23 00:13:39 CET

I just copied a file and removed the original (a rename by hand).

I typed 'svn status' to confirm what I'd just done:

D foo_old_name.c
A + foo_new_name.c

Then I randomly typed 'svn ls' and noticed that my newly copied file
was not listed, but the old one was still there.

Also, normal cmd 'ls' just shows the new renamed copy and not the old
deleted file.

It isn't that big of a deal, just making sure this is a known issue
since people to rely on 'svn ls' might freak out.

I'm using svn, version 1.1.1 (r11581) compiled Oct 25 2004, 13:38:36.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Nov 23 00:15:59 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.