Known 'svn ls' bug?

I just copied a file and removed the original (a rename by hand).

I typed 'svn status' to confirm what I'd just done:

D foo_old_name.c
A + foo_new_name.c

Then I randomly typed 'svn ls' and noticed that my newly copied file
was not listed, but the old one was still there.

Also, normal cmd 'ls' just shows the new renamed copy and not the old
deleted file.

It isn't that big of a deal, just making sure this is a known issue
since people to rely on 'svn ls' might freak out.

I'm using svn, version 1.1.1 (r11581) compiled Oct 25 2004, 13:38:36.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Nov 23 00:15:59 2004