[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Revision # theorhetical upper limit

From: Reid Spencer <reid_at_x10sys.com>
Date: 2004-05-19 09:03:43 CEST

Properly written makefiles that always use paths relative to the current
directory should be fine. If the makefiles aren't written that way then
problems can occur because a Subversion branch is simply a copy (or
apparently so) to another location. For example, most repositories are
laid out like:


where ... implies the basic content of the project. Since the branches
are stored in directories of a different name and a different depth in
the file system, an ill-written makefile could be given some trouble.


On Tue, 2004-05-18 at 23:14, Branko ibej wrote:
> andy.glew@amd.com wrote:
> >(Unfortunately, Subversion branching is more painful than CVS
> >branching, because Subversion branching requires more Makefile
> >changes.)
> >
> >
> I don't understand, why would it require any makefile changes at all?

Received on Wed May 19 09:04:19 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.