Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Mar 2004, John Pybus wrote:
>
>> Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>>>
>>> ok, to bring this thread back to some technical issues, as i read the
>>> above, subversion-1.0.1 *requires* apr-0.9.5, is that what you're
saying?
>>
>> I'm just quoting the documentation. I've only ever installed subversion
>> either from summersoft rpms, or from source in which case I get the code
>> from svn/CVS repositories.
>
> what's curious is that it's not even clear where you'd *get* the apr-0.9.5
> stuff. if i go to the apache site, under download, the most recent
> version that's even available is only apr-0.9.4.
>
> if you try to get more recent, all i see are dated snapshots or the CVS
> tree. it's one thing to have a dependency of a beta release, but it's
> weirder to have a dependency of something you can't even find. that's a
> bit odd.
You would find it as part of an apache tarball.
Max.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Mar 23 13:56:58 2004