RE: Win32 binaries for 0.36.0

I would not advise anyone to use Win 9x to use as a server, to be
frankly. It is not meant to be a server platform, and never will be. I
understand your dissapointment, but maybe you are better of installing
Win2k (or Linux of course ;)) anyhow. Good luck!

P.S. I am just a user commenting, I am not affiliated to the SVN dev
team.

-----Original Message-----
From: Juanma Barranquero [mailto:lektu@mi.madritel.es]
Sent: zaterdag 17 januari 2004 15:26
To: users@subversion.tigris.org
Subject: Re: Win32 binaries for 0.36.0

On Sat, 17 Jan 2004 08:58:23 -0500, mark benedetto king
<mbk@lowlatency.com> wrote:

> Windows 95, 98, and ME do not work well with BDB (at least, not the
> way we use BDB).
>
> http://www.sleepycat.com/docs/ref/build_win/notes.html

Hmm. I'm not versed in BDB speak, but as far as I see, I'm not doing
anything unusual. Creating the database, verifying and recovering it,
all from the same shell (so the same parent process, the same user and
access permissions, etc.), and still the database seems corrupt. If
that's so, then Subversion 1.0 will not be usable as a server in 9X/Me
set ups (though I imagine it'll still be usable as a client).

                                                           /L/e/k/t/u

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Jan 17 17:00:28 2004