[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: WC permissions

From: Branko ÄŒibej <brane_at_xbc.nu>
Date: 2003-12-16 13:47:42 CET

Philip Martin wrote:

>Branko ÄŒibej <brane@xbc.nu> writes:
>
>
>
>>Philip Martin wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Branko ÄŒibej <brane@xbc.nu> writes:
>>>
>>>
>>>>The only way I know to do this on Unix (if your filesystem doesn't have
>>>>inheritable ACLs) is to put all your users into the same group (doesn't
>>>>have to be the primary group), use umask 002 and set the sticky-group
>>>>bit on the directories in the subversion WC.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>On my system chmod(2) says
>>>
>>>"The effective UID of the process must be zero or must match the
>>> owner of the file."
>>>
>>>so the sticky bit does not appear to solve the shared working copy
>>>problem. It does solve the shared repository problem.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>Hm? What does chmod have to do with sticky group ownership?
>>
>>
>
>Perhaps I misunderstood, I thought you were suggesting that group
>access (hence the sticky bit) would be sufficient for shared working
>copies.
>
>
No, you didn't misunderstand, but I forgot about us making files
read-only, and of course chmod requires ownership. How boring.

-- 
Brane ÄŒibej   <brane_at_xbc.nu>   http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Dec 16 13:50:32 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.