[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Transaction is out of date. svn 0.32.1

From: Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman_at_collab.net>
Date: 2003-11-21 22:28:01 CET

On Fri, 2003-11-21 at 15:13, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2003-11-21 13:09:58 -0600, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> > The 'out of date' behavior is not a bug, it's expected.
> >
> > Your last command 'svn rename folder 0 folder1' is actually two
> > operations: the addition of folder1 (with copy history), and the
> > deletion of folder0. But you cannot delete folder0, because
> > folder0's working revision is not HEAD. Read this section in the
> > book, about the limitations of mixed-revision working copies (in a
> > universe of versioned directories)
> I have the same problem (but when changing the svn:ignore property).
> IMHO, if the directory has not changed in the repository (even though
> it has a higher revision number), the changes should be accepted. Or
> would there be risks with that?

No, it's definitely an enhancement we'd like to add to svn_fs_merge()
someday. But at the moment, libsvn_fs doesn't know how to 'merge'
directories. That means you cannot propset or delete a directory which
is not == HEAD.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Nov 21 22:28:51 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.