Re: Transaction is out of date. svn 0.32.1

On 2003-11-21 13:09:58 -0600, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> The 'out of date' behavior is not a bug, it's expected.
>
> Your last command 'svn rename folder 0 folder1' is actually two
> operations: the addition of folder1 (with copy history), and the
> deletion of folder0. But you cannot delete folder0, because
> folder0's working revision is not HEAD. Read this section in the
> book, about the limitations of mixed-revision working copies (in a
> universe of versioned directories)

I have the same problem (but when changing the svn:ignore property).
IMHO, if the directory has not changed in the repository (even though
it has a higher revision number), the changes should be accepted. Or
would there be risks with that?

-- 
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent_at_vinc17.org> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/> - 100%
validated (X)HTML - Acorn Risc PC, Yellow Pig 17, Championnat International
des Jeux Mathématiques et Logiques, TETRHEX, etc.
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / SPACES project at LORIA
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org