Btw, has anybody any experiences from the subclipse? How does it compare
against the RapidSVN or TortoiseSVN.
Mika
>> Thanks all. I think I'll try to at least demo TortoiseSVN; it looks
>> like RapidSVN has an approach that requires you to understand the
>> command line first, and I got it to crash (maybe because there's no
>> version of it matching the version of svn I've got installed on my
>> Windows box).
>>
> About the crashes: which version did you try? The latest version for
> Windows is 0.3.1. You dont have to have subversion installed on your
> computer to use RapidSVN.
>
> And about the concepts:
> In my understanding RapidSVN struggles with the following problem or
> maybe call it paradoxon:
> - being easy to understand and use for a non-technical audience
> - being feature-rich and consistent with the underlying version
> control concepts
>
> Pros for RapidSVN:
> - cross platform (Linux/Unix, Windows now and Mac OS X in the near
> future)
> - performance compared to Java/Swing application
>
> Cons for RapidSVN:
> - still doesnt support all the features svn has
> - still in heavy development
>
> Xela
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Sep 10 17:43:53 2003