Guido van Rossum wrote:
>>Personally, I like TortoiseSVN:
>>
>>http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org
>>
>>There's also RapidSVN:
>>
>>http://rapidsvn.tigris.org
>
>
> Thanks all. I think I'll try to at least demo TortoiseSVN; it looks
> like RapidSVN has an approach that requires you to understand the
> command line first, and I got it to crash (maybe because there's no
> version of it matching the version of svn I've got installed on my
> Windows box).
>
About the crashes: which version did you try? The latest version for
Windows is 0.3.1. You dont have to have subversion installed on your
computer to use RapidSVN.
And about the concepts:
In my understanding RapidSVN struggles with the following problem or
maybe call it paradoxon:
- being easy to understand and use for a non-technical audience
- being feature-rich and consistent with the underlying version
control concepts
Pros for RapidSVN:
- cross platform (Linux/Unix, Windows now and Mac OS X in the near
future)
- performance compared to Java/Swing application
Cons for RapidSVN:
- still doesnt support all the features svn has
- still in heavy development
Xela
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Sep 10 16:02:15 2003