Max Bowsher wrote:
> Mats Nilsson wrote:
> > Maybe cvs2svn should refrain from trying to convert revisions on RCS
> > branches in the absence of corresponding branch labels.
>
> It would be nice to at least fail with an informative error. Feel like
> writing a patch? :-)
I know close to nothing about python, nor about the algorithm of
cvs2svn. I could author an issue, though.
> Should you decide to attempt to enhance mks2cvs, you might
> like to take note
> that CVS branches are supposed to use an *even* branch number
> unless they
> are vendor branches - i.e. 1.15.0.2, not 1.
I know. This doctored example works fine. Correcting this would
obviously require renumbering of the original version numbers. And
keeping a dictionary for resolving references from the project files.
I'd rather avoid it if cvs2svn doesn't require it.
Or do you foresee a conflict against the vendor branch revision?
Does/will cvs2svn apply some special treatment to those branches?
Mats
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Sep 1 14:22:54 2003